|
Appendum: 07, July 2003.
I continue to have this posted here for the benefit of research. This document continues to be the premier example of the bias and inequality of the Clinton/Reno/Freeh DOJ and FBI. I hope it serves as a warning to those young people who will be entering the field of law, especially at the Federal level, of the power they wield. Corrupt men can direct the law enforcement community to wield that power to very destructive ends. Note well that all the hysterical predictions in this document never came to pass. Not one. The attempt by the Clinton Administration to demonize his political opponents in this is transparent beyond debate. Indeed, some of his comments in response to the fiasco at Waco are noteworthy:
"I will say this, however. I was, frankly, surprised would be a mild word, to say that anyone that would suggest that the Attorney General should resign because some religious fanatics murdered themselves. ... There is, unfortunately, a rise in this sort of fanaticism all across the world. And we may have to confront it again." God help us if someone, Democrat or Republican, like Clinton ever gets into power again.... |
Good—gosh.
Dear valued friends
and peers, what follows is the document recently released to the public by
the Federal Bureau of Investigation, entitled,
"Project Megiddo." As stated, it is their strategic assessment
of the potential for domestic terrorism in the United States undertaken in
anticipation of or response to the arrival of the new millennium. I
strongly suggest you read it through.
From my recent studies concerning the Christian Identity movement and extremist racial hate groups over-all, the writer's threat assessment from a law enforcement perspective seems pretty accurate. These are some extremely dangerous people they are dealing with. Anyone who has opportunity to read the Turner Diaries should have a pretty good idea just how dangerous they are.
But the accuracy
ends there. They are dealing with a still very small minority. The
writer/writers have made no attempts whatsoever to differentiate between
these militant fringe groups and mainstream Christianity as a whole.
Notice their generalized, broad-brush, references to the "right wing"
on different occasions. "Right wing" is a generic political term used
in the secular broadcast and print media to refer to pretty much anybody
or any organization that espouses or adheres to lines of Conservative political
and Christian (Biblical) thought. If you are a secular Republican,
you're right wing. All are alluded to and implied to be "extremist"
groups—and dangerous. That bias is transparent from the
start. Simply stating "right wing" achieves a sweeping
generalization that fairly begs to be dismissed out of hand.
Also, no attempt
is made to differentiate between anybody who holds to a well balanced
Biblical "end times" type philosophy and belief system. Most of
the doctrine referred to (that they pretty much butcher theologically in
their assertions) is being taught from almost every single Fundamentalist
and Evangelical pulpit in America! All are derided and implied to be
"cultish" in some form. Their broadest interpretation of a cult is
stated: "In the broadest meaning, cults are composed of individuals who
demonstrate 'great devotion to a person, idea, object or movement'."
That casts a pretty wide net in implication. The tone, direction,
and positioning of this article is extremely unbalanced.
The opposition is going
to take this report and run with it. So am I.
A lot of this hysteria about the approaching millennium and Y2K can be traced right back to the steady diet of apocalyptic, "end-times" doctrine and theology which has been pouring from mainstream Evangelical and Fundamentalist pulpits these last twenty years. Biblical eschatology has become an incredible distraction to the Church in America! A huge amount of Church resources and time has been devoted to sermons and tapes and books and television programs concerning this subject (watching the sky while everything around us goes to pot), while our top priority as Christians, to preach the Gospel, to aggressively reach out to a world in trouble, to influence our culture around us, has been almost abandoned under the faithless pretext of being "realistic" and "rational" and "pragmatic" concerning current societal conditions.
The focus has
been so much on the end times, it has fostered an attitude of despair, cynicism,
fatalism, and a siege mentality by many, many people in the Church. I
see it all the time; I point it out all the time. It's like a growing
cancer in so many aspects of Christian life. Especially among the younger
crowd that has come of age these past two decades, since Hal Lindsey's first
prophecy book, "The Late Great Planet Earth" was published and the
"prophecy" movement has taken off. They are constantly hearing about
an ever impending chaos and ruin that their elders have implied they can
do nothing about (contrary to the myriad unconditional promises of God).
And this is where it has brought us.
This document
should be printed out and dropped on the desk of every Senior Pastor in America,
especially those who have placed an over-emphasis on prophecy and focusing
so much time and resources on endtimes things in their sermon schedules,
instead of on living an unbending faith walk and the promises of God, and
the Biblical fact that the Church in America can make a difference
in America society today. Regardless of the renunciations of the hardliner
nay-sayers! Regardless of where we are in the prophetic time-line!
The only ones who have the resources to effectively oppose these fringe
groups, and fringe groups sporting the "christian" tag, is the Church,
from the Bible, from the moral high ground. The only way this
situation in America can be turned around is if the Church turns around and
resists this apocalyptic fatalism, this
breakdown of law
enforcement in the spiritual realm, in any form that it manifests itself,
and it's evident results from within the spiritual realm, and our own hearts
and minds.
I would also suggest that the senior leadership of every Spirit filled Church in America start planning right now for Millennial Eve prayer services, as well as a radical change of tack throughout the year 2000. Regardless of the causes or social, temporal reasons for this sharp stance by the FBI and the Federal government and any impending Y2K challenges, the bottom line is again, spiritual, as the spiritual realm is the command sphere. Satan and his hoods, exploiting our lack of initiative and complacency, are overtly seeking to destroy this nation, and specifically the Church in this nation. And the only way to combat this spiritual incursion is by opposing it with spiritual weapons in true, un-attenuated faith. Satan, working through subversive groups within society, would have chaos and ruin. The Spirit-filled Church once again needs to oppose that by praying down a blockade around this nation's borders in the coming year.
We also need, once again, to pray for the Christian men and women of professional law enforcement as they deal with the unique peculiarities of being caught right in the middle of this really bizarre mess.
The original FBI Adobe
Acrobat .pdf file can be downloaded
here.
Adobe Acrobat Reader can
be downloaded
here.
Mr. Ryter has established himself as a
credible, heavy-hitting, Conservative/Christian commentator on events and
trends in the temporal/political realm. This article deals specifically with
the inherent danger to the Church in America and the Conservative community,
when the powers that be start to abuse the formidable power of the American
law enforcement framework and community.
His article further proves the existence of, and overt
hostility towards, Christians, and indeed anybody else espousing any Conservative
views. Especially as evidenced in "Project Megiddo" as published
by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
·
So Who Is A Terrorist? ·
Endangered Liberties Commentary From The Free Congress
Foundation
·
The New American - Criminalizing Dissent·
The FBI’s Project Megiddo, which warns against millennial
terrorism, paints constitutionalists, devout Christians, hate groups,
and militias with the same broad strokes.
·Apologetics
Index - FBI report: Project Megiddo·
Heavily Linked Research Document by The Apologetics
Index. Good Resource for absolutely picking this document
apart!
·"Police
Accountability, 'Civilian Review Boards,'
And Metaphors For The Church"·
Is a secular organization qualified to police or deal with
Christian philosophy based fringe groups and cults? Or is this an area
exclusively the responsibility of the Church itself; an area the leadership
of the Church has been lacking in? Let's draw some parallels off of a recent
document crafted by a very qualified Christian Police Officer, concerning
"civilian review boards" and professional law enforcment. (Subpage to
Project Megiddo.)
Bill Clinton called Freeh a “law enforcement legend” when he nominated him as FBI Director. The good feelings would not last. Going toe-to-toe with his boss during the scandal-plagued ‘90s, Freeh fought hard to defend his agency from political interference and to protect America from the growing threat of international terrorism. When Clinton later called that appointment the worst one he had made as president, Freeh considered it “a badge of honor.”
Still, the scandals that plagued the FBI during his tenure can only be laid at his feet as commander. The "Project Megiddo" effort will continue to be evidence of that, as the radical leftist bent of the whole Clinton administration of that time infected even the FBI, a law enforcement organization that should always model objectivity and professionalism.
The attached analysis, entitled PROJECT MEGIDDO, is an FBI strategic assessment of the potential for domestic terrorism in the United States undertaken in anticipation of or response to the arrival of the new millennium.
PROJECT MEGIDDO
Table of Contents:
When
Does the New Millennium Begin? 7
VI. BLACK HEBREW ISRAELITES
23
VIII. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF JERUSALEM
30
For over four thousand years, MEGIDDO, a hill in northern Israel, has been the site of many battles. Ancient cities were established there to serve as a fortress on the plain of Jezreel to guard a mountain pass. As Megiddo was built and rebuilt, one city upon the other, a mound or hill was formed. The Hebrew word "Armageddon" means "hill of Megiddo." In English, the word has come to represent battle itself. The last book in the New Testament of the Bible designates Armageddon as the assembly point in the apocalyptic setting of God's final and conclusive battle against evil. The name "Megiddo" is an apt title for a project that analyzes those who believe the year 2000 will usher in the end of the world and who are willing to perpetrate acts of violence to bring that end about.
The
year 2000 is being discussed and debated at all levels of society. Most of
the discussions regarding this issue revolve around the topic of technology
and our society's overwhelming dependence on the multitude of computers and
computer chips which make our world run smoothly. However, the upcoming
millennium also holds important implications beyond the issue of computer
technology. Many extremist individuals and groups place some significance
on the next millennium, and as such it will present challenges to law enforcement
at many levels. The significance is based primarily upon either religious
beliefs relating to the Apocalypse or political beliefs relating to the New
World Order (NWO) conspiracy theory. The challenge is how well law enforcement
will prepare and respond.
The
following report, entitled "Project Megiddo," is intended to analyze the
potential for extremist criminal activity in the United States by individuals
or domestic extremist groups who profess an apocalyptic view of the millennium
or attach special significance to the year 2000. The purpose behind this
assessment is to provide law enforcement agencies with a clear picture of
potential extremism motivated by the next millennium. The report does not
contain information on domestic terrorist groups whose actions are not influenced
by the year 2000.
There
are numerous difficulties involved in providing a thorough analysis of domestic
security threats catalyzed by the new millennium. Quite simply, the very
nature of the current domestic terrorism threat places severe limitations
on effective intelligence gathering and evaluation. Ideological and philosophical
belief systems which attach importance, and possibly violence, to the millennium
have been well-articulated. From a law enforcement perspective, the problem
therefore is not a lack of understanding of motivating ideologies: The
fundamental problem is that the traditional focal point for counterterrorism
analysis -- the terrorist group -- is not always well-defined or relevant
in the current environment.
The
general trend in domestic extremism is the terrorist’s disavowal of
traditional, hierarchical, and structured terrorist organizations. Even
well-established militias, which tend to organize along military lines with
central control, are characterized by factionalism and
disunity.
While
several “professional” terrorist groups still exist and present
a continued threat to domestic security, the overwhelming majority of extremist
groups in the United States have adopted a fragmented, leaderless structure
where individuals or small groups act with autonomy. Clearly, the worst act
of domestic terrorism in United States history was perpetrated by merely
two individuals: Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. In many cases, extremists
of this sort are extremely difficult to identify until after an incident
has occurred. Thus, analysis of domestic extremism in which the group serves
as the focal point of evaluation has obvious limitations.
The
Project Megiddo intelligence initiative has identified very few indications
of specific threats to domestic security. Given the present nature of domestic
extremism, this is to be expected. However, this is a function of the limitations
of the group-oriented model of counterterrorism analysis and should not be
taken necessarily as reflective of a minor or trivial domestic threat. Without
question, this initiative has revealed indicators of potential violent activity
on the part of extremists in this country. Militias, adherents of racist
belief systems such as Christian Identity and Odinism, and other radical
domestic extremists are clearly focusing on the millennium as a time of action.
Certain individuals from these various perspectives are acquiring weapons,
storing food and clothing, raising funds through fraudulent means, procuring
safe houses, preparing compounds, surveying potential targets, and recruiting
new converts. These and other indicators are not taking place in a vacuum,
nor are they random or arbitrary. In the final analysis, while making specific
predictions is extremely difficult, acts of violence in commemoration of
the millennium are just as likely to occur as not. In the absence of intelligence
that the more established and organized terrorist groups are planning millennial
violence as an organizational strategy, violence is most likely to be perpetrated
by radical fringe members of established groups. For example, while Aryan
Nations leader Richard Butler publicly frowns on proactive violence, adherents
of his religion or individual members of his organization may commit acts
of violence autonomously. Potential
cult-related violence presents additional challenges to law enforcement.
The potential for violence on behalf of members of biblically-driven cults
is determined almost exclusively by the whims of the cult leader.
Therefore, effective intelligence and analysis of such cults requires an
extensive understanding of the cult leader. Cult members generally act to
serve and please the cult leader rather than accomplish an ideological
objective. Almost universally, cult leaders are viewed as messianic in the
eyes of their followers. Also, the cult leader’s prophecies, preachings,
orders, and objectives are subject to indiscriminate change. Thus, while
analysis of publicly stated goals and objectives of cults may provide
hints about their behavior and intentions, it is just as likely to be
uninformed or, at worst, misleading. Much more valuable is a thorough
examination of the cult leader, his position of power over his followers,
and an awareness of the responding behavior and activity of the cult.
Sudden changes in activity - for example, less time spent on “Bible study”
and more time spent on “physical training” - indicate that the cult may be
preparing for some type of action. The
millennium holds special significance for many, and as this pivotal point
in time approaches, the impetus for the initiation of violence becomes
more acute. Several religiously motivated groups envision a quick, fiery
ending in an apocalyptic battle. Others may initiate a sustained campaign
of terrorism in the United States to prevent the NWO. Armed with the
urgency of the millennium as a motivating factor, new clandestine groups
may conceivably form to engage in violence toward the U.S. Government or
its citizens. Most
importantly, this analysis clearly shows that perceptions matter. The
perceptions of the leaders and followers of extremist organizations will
contribute much toward the ultimate course of action they choose. For
example, in-depth analysis of Y2K compliancy on the part of various key
sectors that rely on computers has determined that, despite a generally
positive outlook for overall compliance, there will be problem industries
and minor difficulties and inconveniences.1
If they occur, these inconveniences are likely to cause varying responses
by the extreme fringes. Members of various militia groups, for example,
have identified potentially massive power failures as an indication of a
United Nations-directed NWO takeover. While experts have indicated that
only minor brownouts will occur, various militias are likely to perceive
such minor brownouts as indicative of a larger conspiracy.2 The
Senate Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology Problem has stated
that some state and local governments could be unprepared, including the
inability to provide benefits payments.3
This could have a significant impact in major urban areas, resulting in
the possibility for civil unrest. Violent white supremacists are likely to
view such unrest as an affirmation of a racist, hate-filled world view.
Likewise, militia members who predict the implementation of martial law in
response to a Y2K computer failure would become all the more
fearful. Are
we already living on the precipice of the Apocalypse - the chaotic final
period of warfare between the forces of good and evil signaling the second
coming of Christ, as forecast in the New Testament’s Book of Revelation?
Or, will life on earth continue for another 1,000 years, allowing humans
to eliminate disease and solve the mysteries of the aging process so they
can live as long as Methuselah, colonize space, commune with
extraterrestrials, unravel the secrets of teleportation, and usher in a
golden age of peace and productivity? 4 At
first glance, some of the predictions compiled in Prophecies for the New
Millennium that claim to foretell how the millennium will affect the
United States seem benign. In fact, those predictions capture some of the
countless ways that domestic terrorists view how the millennium will
affect the world. The threat posed by extremists as a result of perceived
events associated with the Year 2000 (Y2K) is very real. Numerous
religious extremists claim that a race war will soon begin, and have taken
steps to become martyrs in their predicted battle between good and evil.
Three recent incidents committed by suspects who adhere to ideologies that
emphasize millennial related violence illustrate those beliefs: Buford O.
Furrow, Jr., the man charged in the August 1999 shootings at a Los Angeles
area Jewish day care center, told authorities "its time for America to
wake and kill the Jews"; Ben Smith, who committed suicide after shooting
at minorities in Indiana and Illinois, killing two and injuring ten, over
the July 4, 1999 weekend, was found to have literature in his home that
indicated the year 2000 would be the start of the killing of minorities;
and John William King, the man convicted in the dragging death of James
Byrd, Jr., a black man in Jasper, Texas, believed that his actions would
help to initiate a race war. Each of these men believed in the imminence
of a racial holy war. Meanwhile,
for members of the militia movement the new millennium has a political
overtone rather than a religious one. It is their belief that the United
Nations has created a secret plan, known as the New World Order (NWO), to
conquer the world beginning in 2000. The NWO will be set in motion by the
Y2K computer crisis. Religious
motivation and the NWO conspiracy theory are the two driving forces behind
the potential for millennial violence. As the end of the millennium draws
near, biblical prophecy and political philosophy may merge into acts of
violence by the more extreme members of domestic terrorist groups that are
motivated, in part, by religion. The volatile mix of apocalyptic religions
and NWO conspiracy theories may produce violent acts aimed at
precipitating the end of the world as prophesied in the Bible. When and
how Christ’s second coming will occur is a critical point in the ideology
of those motivated by extremist religious beliefs about the millennium.
There is no consensus within Christianity regarding the specific date that
the Apocalypse will occur. However, within many right-wing religious
groups there is a uniform belief that the Apocalypse is approaching. Some
of these same groups also point to a variety of non-religious indicators
such as gun control, the Y2K computer problem, the NWO, the banking
system, and a host of other “signs” that the Apocalypse is near. Almost
uniformly, the belief among right-wing religious extremists is that the
federal government is an arm of Satan. Therefore, the millennium will
bring about a battle between Christian martyrs and the government. At the
core of this volatile mix is the belief of apocalyptic religions and cults
that the battle against Satan, as prophesied in the Book of Revelation,
will begin in 2000. An
example of the confrontational nature and belief system of religiously
motivated suspects illustrates the unique challenges that law enforcement
faces when dealing with a fatalist/martyr philosophy. It also illustrates
the domino effect that may occur after such a confrontation. Gordon Kahl,
an adherent to the anti-government/racist Christian Identity religion,
escaped after a 1983 shootout with police that left two Deputy U.S.
Marshals dead. He was later killed during a subsequent shootout with the
FBI and others that also left a county sheriff dead. In response to the
killing of Kahl, Bob Mathews, a believer in the racist Odinist ideology,
founded The Order. After The Order committed numerous crimes, its members
were eventually tracked down. Mathews escaped after engaging in a gun
battle and later wrote, “Why are so many men so eager to destroy their own
kind for the benefit of the Jews and the mongrels? I see three FBI agents
hiding behind some trees . . . I could have easily killed them . . . They
look like good racial stock yet all their talents are given to a
government which is openly trying to mongrelize the very race these agents
are part of . . . I have been a good soldier, a fearless warrior. I will
die with honor and join my brothers in [heaven].” Exemplifying his beliefs
as a martyr, Mathews later burned to death in an armed standoff with the
FBI. In light of the enormous amount of millennial rhetoric, the FBI
sought to analyze a number of variables that have the potential to spark
violent acts perpetrated by domestic terrorists. Religious beliefs, the
Y2K computer problem, and gun control laws all have the potential to
become catalysts for such terrorism. The following elements are essential
to understanding the phenomenon of domestic terrorism related to the
millennium: When Does the
New Millennium Begin? As
the nation and the world prepare to celebrate the arrival of the new
millennium, a debate has arisen as to the correct date for its beginning.
Although the true starting point of the next millennium is January 1,
2001, as established by the U.S. Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C.,
our nation's official time keeper, many will celebrate January 1, 2000, as
the start of the millennium. The majority of domestic terrorists, like the
general public, place a greater significance on January 1,
2000. Blueprint for
Action: The Turner Diaries Many
right-wing extremists are inspired by The Turner Diaries, a book written
by William Pierce (under the pseudonym Andrew Macdonald), the leader of
the white supremacist group National Alliance. The book details a violent
overthrow of the federal government by white supremacists and also
describes a brutal race war that is to take place simultaneously. To date,
several groups or individuals have been inspired by this
book: • At the time of his arrest, Timothy McVeigh, the man
responsible for the Oklahoma City bombing, had a copy of The Turner
Diaries in his possession. McVeigh’s action against the Murrah Federal
Building was strikingly similar to an event described in the book where
the fictional terrorist group blows up FBI Headquarters. • The Order, an early 1980s terrorist cell involved
in murder, robberies, and counterfeiting, was motivated by the book’s
scenarios for a race war. The group murdered Alan Berg, a Jewish talk show
host, and engaged in other acts of violence in order to hasten the race
war described in the book. The Order’s efforts later inspired another
group, The New Order, which planned to commit similar crimes in an effort
to start a race war that would lead to a violent revolution.5 • Most recently, The Turner Diaries provided
inspiration to John William King, the man convicted for dragging a black
man to his death in Jasper, Texas. As King shackled James Byrd’s legs to
the back of his truck he was reported to say, “We’re going to start the
Turner Diaries early.”6 During the year 2000 and beyond, The Turner Diaries will be an inspiration for right-wing terrorist groups to act because it outlines both a revolutionary takeover of the government and a race war. These elements of the book appeal to a majority of right-wing extremists because it is their belief that one or both events will coincide with Y2K. Religiously
based domestic terrorists use the New Testament’s Book of Revelation --
the prophecy of the endtime -- for the foundation of their belief in the
Apocalypse. Religious extremists interpret the symbolism portrayed in the
Book of Revelation and mold it to predict that the endtime is now and that
the Apocalypse is near. To understand many religious extremists, it is
crucial to know the origin of the Book of Revelation and the meanings of
its words, numbers and characters. The
Book of Revelation was written by a man named “John” who was exiled by the
Roman government to a penal colony - the island of Patmos - because of his
beliefs in Christ.7 While
on the island, he experienced a series of visions, described in the Book
of Revelation. The writing in the Book of Revelation is addressed to
churches who were at the time experiencing or were threatened by
persecution from Rome because they were not following the government. For
this reason, some believe the Book of Revelation was written in code
language, much of which was taken from other parts of the
Bible. One interpretation describing the essence of the message contained in Revelation is that God will overcome Christianity’s enemies (Roman Government/Satan) and that the persecuted communities should persevere.8 For right-wing groups who believe they are being persecuted by the satanic government of the United States, the Book of Revelation's message fits perfectly into their world view. This world view, in combination with a literal interpretation of the Book of Revelation, is reflected in extremist ideology, violent acts, and literature. For this reason, it is imperative to know the meaning of some of the “code words” frequently used:
• Four (4) signifies the world.
Black
Hebrew Israelites, a black supremacist group, typify the use of numerology
from the Book of Revelation. They believe group members will comprise the
144,000 people who are saved by God in the second coming that is outlined
in Revelation (7:1-17). In the Book of Revelation, John is shown a vision
of 144,000 martyrs who have survived and did not submit to Satan. This
number is derived from the assertion that the twelve tribes of Israel
consisted of 12,000 people each. Groups
not only use the Bible to interpret the endtimes, but use it to justify
their ideology. Phineas Priests, an amorphous group of Christian Identity
adherents, base their entire ideology on Chapter 25 of the Book of
Numbers. The passage depicts a scene where Phineas kills an Israelite who
was having relations with a Midianite woman and God then granted Phineas
and all of his descendants a pledge of everlasting priesthood. Modern day
followers of the Phineas Priest ideology believe themselves to be the
linear descendants of Phineas and this passage gives them biblical
justification to punish those who transgress God’s laws. Therefore, the
group is ardently opposed to race mixing and strongly believes in racial
separation. The number 25 is often used as a symbol of the
group. To
understand the mind set of why religious extremists would actively seek to
engage in violent confrontations with law enforcement, the most common
extremist ideologies must be understood. Under these ideologies, many
extremists view themselves as religious martyrs who have a duty to
initiate or take part in the coming battles against Satan. Domestic
terrorist groups who place religious significance on the millennium
believe the federal government will act as an arm of Satan in the final
battle. By extension, the FBI is viewed as acting on Satan’s
behalf. The
philosophy behind targeting the federal government or entities perceived
to be associated with it is succinctly described by Kerry Noble, a former
right-wing extremist. He says the right-wing “envision[s] a dark and
gloomy endtime scenario, where some Antichrist makes war against
Christians.”10 The House of
Yahweh, a Texas based religious group whose leaders are former members of
the tax protesting Posse Comitatus, is typical: Hawkins (the leader) has
interpreted biblical scripture that the Israeli Peace Accord signed on
October 13, 1993, has started a 7-year period of tribulation which will
end on October 14, 2000, with the return of the Yeshua (the
Messiah).11 He also has interpreted
that the FBI will be the downfall of the House of Yahweh and that the Waco
Branch Davidian raids in 1993 were a warning to The House of Yahweh from
the federal government, which he terms “the beast.”12
Similarly, Richard Butler, leader of the
white supremacist group Aryan Nations, said the following when asked what
might have motivated the day care shooting by Buford O. Furrow, Jr., one
of his group's followers: "There's a war against the white race. There's a
war of extermination against the white male."13 The New World
Order Conspiracy Theory and the Year 2000 Computer Bug Unlike
religiously based terrorists, militia anxiety and paranoia specifically
relating to the year 2000 are based mainly on a political ideology. Some
militia members read significance into 2000 as it relates to their
conception of the NWO conspiracy.14 The NWO conspiracy theory
holds that the United Nations (UN) will lead a military coup against the
nations of the world to form a socialist or One World Government. UN
troops, consisting mostly of foreign armies, will commence a military
takeover of America. The UN will mainly use foreign troops on American
soil because foreigners will have fewer reservations about killing
American citizens. U.S. armed forces will not attempt to stop this
invasion by UN troops and, in fact, the U.S. military may be “deputized”
as a branch of the UN armed forces. The American military contingent
overseas will also play a large part in this elaborate conspiracy theory,
as they will be used to help conquer the rest of the world. The rationale
for this part of the theory is that American soldiers will also have less
qualms about killing foreigners, as opposed to killing their own
citizens. Under
this hypothetical NWO/One World Government, the following events are to
take place: 1) private property rights and private gun ownership will be
abolished; 2) all national, state and local elections will become
meaningless, since they will be controlled by the UN; 3) the U.S.
Constitution will be supplanted by the UN charter; 4) only approved
churches and other places of worship will be permitted to operate and will
become appendages of the One World Religion, which will be the only
legitimate doctrine of religious beliefs and ethical values; 5) home
schooling will be outlawed and all school curriculum will need to be
approved by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO); and 6) American military bases and other federal
facilities will be used as concentration camps by the UN to confine those
patriots, including the militias, who defy the NWO. Other groups beside
the UN that are often mentioned as being part of the NWO conspiracy theory
are Jews, Communists, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers
and the Trilateral Commission. Law enforcement officials will probably
notice different versions of this theory, depending upon the
source. The
NWO conspiracy theory is particularly relevant to the millennium because
the year 2000 is considered to be a triggering device for the NWO due to
the element of computer breakdown. Many computers around the world are
based on a numerical system in which the year is only registered by the
last two digits. A number of militia members accept the theory that on
January 1, 2000, many computers will misinterpret this date as January 1,
1900, and malfunction and/or shut down completely. They further believe
that these major computer malfunctions will cause widespread chaos at all
levels of society- economic, social and political. This chaos will
theoretically create a situation in which American civilization will
collapse, which will then produce an environment that the UN will exploit
to forcibly take over the United States. Therefore, these militia members
(as well as other groups) believe that the year 2000 will be the catalyst
for the NWO. According
to James Wickstrom, former leader of the defunct Posse Comitatus and
“Minister” of the True Church of Israel, anyone who holds any powerful
political influence knows that the Y2K crisis may be the final fuse that
will lead to the NWO that “David Rockefeller and the rest of his satanic
jew seedline desire to usher in upon the earth.”15 He claims that Jews have
conspired to create the Y2K problem and that the prospect of impending
computer failure is very real. Similarly, The New American, an organ of
the ultraconservative John Birch Society, speculates that the Y2K bug
could be America’s Reichstag fire, a reference to the 1933 arson attack on
Germany’s Parliament building that was used by Hitler as an excuse to
enact police state laws. Similar to this train of thought, Norm Olson,
leader of the Northern Michigan Regional Militia, believes constitutional
rights probably will be suspended before the real crisis hits. He states:
“It will be the worst time for humanity since the Noahic flood.”16 However,
there are some extremists who do not attach any major significance to the
Y2K problem. In his article, “The Millennium Bug and ‘Mainstreaming’ the
News," William Pierce of the National Alliance tells his followers not to
worry, or at least, not to worry very much about the Y2K issue. Pierce
predicts that the main event that will occur on New Year’s Day 2000 is
that crazed millennialists will go “berserk when the Second Coming fails
to occur.” Also, “a few right-wing nuts may launch a premature attack on
the government, figuring that without its computers the government won’t
be able to fight back.” Pierce claims that the lights will remain on, and
that airplanes will not fall from the sky. He says that he is able to make
such a prediction with some degree of confidence because, “contrary to
what some cranks would have you believe, the computer professionals and
the government have been working on the Y2K problem for some time.”17 The
passage of the Brady Bill and assault weapons ban in 1994 were interpreted
by those in the militia movement and among the right-wing as the first
steps towards disarming citizens in preparation for the UN-led NWO
takeover. Some are convinced that the registration of gun owners is in
preparation for a confiscation of firearms and eventually the arrest of
the gun owners themselves. An article by Larry Pratt, Executive Director
for Gun Owners of America, interprets a 1995 UN study of small arms, done
reportedly in cooperation with U.S. police, customs and military services,
as part of the UN’s plan to take over the U.S. Pratt goes on to say that
the “UN is increasingly assuming the jurisdictional authority of a federal
world government with the U.S. as just one of scores of member states. And
gun control -- meaning civilian disarmament -- is high up on the agenda of
the UN.”18 Speculation like this only
serves to fuel the already existing paranoia of militia and patriot
groups. The
right-wing believes that many of the restrictions being placed on the
ownership of firearms today mirror events in The Turner Diaries. In his
book, Pierce writes about the United States government banning the private
possession of firearms and staging gun raids in an effort to arrest gun
owners. The book discusses the government/police use of black men,
assigned as “special deputies” to carry out the gun raids. Many members of
the right-wing movement view the book as prophetic, believing that it is
only a matter of time before these events occur in real
life. In
the aftermath of the school shootings in Littleton, Colorado, President
Clinton, Congress, and Attorney General Reno acted swiftly to propose new
laws aimed at restricting the sales of guns to juveniles and to close
loopholes in existing laws. In May 1999, the Senate passed a bill to ban
the importation of high capacity ammunition magazines and require
background checks for guns sold at gun shows. In light of the enormous
importance and prominent role that extremist groups place on the Second
Amendment, it is probable that recent government actions aimed at
controlling guns are perceived to be compelling signs of the UN-led NWO
takeover. Christian
Identity is an ideology which asserts that the white Aryan race is God’s
chosen race and that whites comprise the ten lost tribes of Israel.19 There is no single
document that expresses this belief system. Adherents refer to the Bible
to justify their racist ideals. Interpreting the Book of Genesis,
Christian Identity followers assert that Adam was preceded by other,
lesser races, identified as “the beasts of the field” (Gen. 1:25). Eve was
seduced by the snake (Satan) and gave birth to two seed lines: Cain, the
direct descendent of Satan and Eve, and Able, who was of good Aryan stock
through Adam. Cain then became the progenitor of the Jews in his
subsequent matings with the non-Adamic races. Christian Identity adherents
believe the Jews are predisposed to carry on a conspiracy against the
Adamic seed line and today have achieved almost complete control of the
earth.20 This is referred to as the
two-seedline doctrine, which provides Christian Identity followers with a
biblical justification for hatred. The
roots of the Christian Identity movement can be traced back to
British-Israelism, the conviction that the British are the lineal
descendants of the “ten lost tribes” of Israel. It is a belief that
existed for some time before it became a movement in the second half of
the 19th century. The writings of John Wilson helped to extend the idea of
British-Israelism to Anglo-Israelism, which included other Teutonic
peoples -- mostly northern European peoples from Germany, Italy, France
and Switzerland. British-Israelism was brought to America in the early
part of the 1920s, where it remained decentralized until the 1930s. At
that time, the movement underwent the final transformation to become what
we know as Christian Identity, at which time its ties to the original
English movement were cut and it became distinctly American. Wesley
Swift is considered the single most significant figure in the early years
of the Christian Identity movement in the United States. He popularized it
in the right-wing by “combining British-Israelism, a demonic
anti-Semitism, and political extremism.”21 He founded his own
church in California in the mid 1940s where he could preach this ideology.
In addition, he had a daily radio broadcast in California during the 1950s
and 60s, through which he was able to proclaim his ideology to a large
audience. With Swift’s efforts, the message of his church spread, leading
to the creation of similar churches throughout the country. In 1957, the
name of his church was changed to The Church of Jesus Christ Christian,
which is used today by Aryan Nations (AN) churches. One
of Swift’s associates, William Potter Gale, was far more militant than
Swift and brought a new element to Christian Identity churches. He became
a leading figure in the anti-tax and paramilitary movements of the 1970s
and 80s. There are numerous Christian Identity churches that preach
similar messages and some espouse more violent rhetoric than others, but
all hold fast to the belief that Aryans are God’s chosen race. Christian
Identity also believes in the inevitability of the end of the world and
the Second Coming of Christ. It is believed that these events are part of
a cleansing process that is needed before Christ’s kingdom can be
established on earth. During this time, Jews and their allies will attempt
to destroy the white race using any means available. The result will be a
violent and bloody struggle -- a war, in effect -- between God’s forces,
the white race, and the forces of evil, the Jews and nonwhites.
Significantly, many adherents believe that this will be tied into the
coming of the new millennium. The
view of what Armageddon will be varies among Christian Identity believers.
Some contend there will be a race war in which millions will die; others
believe that the United Nations, backed by Jewish representatives of the
anti-Christ, will take over the country and promote a New World Order. One
Christian Identity interpretation is that white Christians have been
chosen to watch for signs of the impending war in order to warn others.
They are to then physically struggle with the forces of evil against sin
and other violations of God’s law (i.e., race-mixing and
internationalism); many will perish, and some of God’s chosen will be
forced to wear the Mark of the Beast to participate in business and
commerce. After the final battle is ended and God’s kingdom is established
on earth, only then will the Aryan people be recognized as the one and
true Israel. Christian
Identity adherents believe that God will use his chosen race as his
weapons to battle the forces of evil. Christian Identity followers believe
they are among those chosen by God to wage this battle during Armageddon
and they will be the last line of defense for the white race and Christian
America. To prepare for these events, they engage in survivalist and
paramilitary training, storing foodstuffs and supplies, and caching
weapons and ammunition. They often reside on compounds located in remote
areas. As
the millennium approaches, various right-wing groups pose a threat to
American society. The radical right encompasses a vast number and variety
of groups, such as survivalists, militias, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis,
Christian Identity churches, the AN and skinheads. These groups are not
mutually exclusive and within the subculture individuals easily migrate
from one group to another. This intermixing of organizations makes it
difficult to discern a singular religious ideology or belief system that
encompasses the right-wing. Nevertheless,
Christian Identity is the most unifying theology for a number of these
diverse groups and one widely adhered to by white supremacists. It is a
belief system that provides its members with a religious basis for racism
and an ideology that condones violence against non-Aryans. This doctrine
allows believers to fuse religion with hate, conspiracy theories, and
apocalyptic fear of the future. Christian Identity-inspired millennialism
has a distinctly racist tinge in the belief that Armageddon will be a race
war of Aryans against Jews and nonwhites. The potential difficulty society
may face due to the Y2K computer glitch is considered by a number of
Christian Identity adherents to be the perfect event upon which to
instigate a race war. There
are a number of issues concerning the Christian Identity belief system
that create problems when determining the threat level of groups. First,
Christian Identity does not have a national organizational structure.
Rather, it is a grouping of churches throughout the country which follows
its basic ideology. Some of these churches can be as small as a dozen
people, and some as large as the AN church, which claims membership in the
thousands. In addition, some groups take the belief to a higher extreme
and believe violence is the means to achieve their goal. This lack of
structure creates a greater potential for violent actions by lone
offenders and/or leaderless cells. It is important to note that only a
small percentage of Christian Identity adherents believe that the new
millennium will bring about a race war. However, those that do have a high
propensity for violence. Secondly,
there are many factions of the right-wing, from Christian Identity to
militias, all of which are intermingled in ideology and members. In some
cases it is easy for a person to be a member of more than one group or to
move from one to another. Often, if a member of one group believes the
group is lax in its convictions, he or she will gravitate to a group that
is more radical. The
third concern is the increased level of cooperation between the different
groups. This trend can be seen throughout the right-wing. Christian
Identity followers are pairing up with militias to receive paramilitary
training and have also joined with members of the Ku Klux Klan and other
right-wing groups. This cohesiveness creates an environment in which
ideology can easily spread and branch out. However, it makes the job of
law enforcement much more difficult as there are no distinctive borders
between groups or ideology. Lastly,
the formation of splinter groups or state chapters from larger
organizations presents an increased level of threat due to the likelihood
that the leader has diminished control over the members and actions of the
smaller groups. The AN is a large group that adheres to the Christian
Identity belief system. The group espouses hatred toward Jews, the federal
government, blacks and other minorities. The ultimate goal of the AN is to
forcibly take five northwestern states -- Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming,
Washington and Montana -- from the United States government in order to
establish an Aryan homeland. It consists of a headquarters in Hayden Lake,
Idaho, and a number of state chapters, which often act as their own
entities. While the leader may not support or encourage acts of violence,
it is easy for small cells of members or splinter groups to take part in
violent acts without the knowledge of the leader. The individuals are
associated with the group as a whole and carry the name of the group, but
may perpetrate acts on their own. These
factors make a threat assessment concerning millennial violence difficult
to determine. There is a moderate possibility of small factions of
right-wing groups, whether they be members of the same group, or members
of different groups, acting in an overtly violent manner in order to
initiate the Apocalypse. Several
problems associated with the assessment for violence can be seen when
looking at the structure and actions of the AN. The AN has been
headquartered at Hayden Lake since the late 1970s and remains a focal
point for the group’s activities. Its annual World Congress attracts a
number of different factions from the right-wing, including members and
leaders of various right-wing groups. The World Congress is often viewed
as a sort of round table to discuss right-wing issues. These meetings have
led to an increased level of contact between AN members and members and
leaders of other groups. This degree of networking within the right-wing
may further the AN’s base of support and help advance its
cause. One
of the greatest threats posed by the right-wing in terms of millennial
violence is the formation of a conglomeration of individuals that will
work together to commit criminal acts. This has happened with some
frequency in the past. Bob Mathews formed a subgroup of the AN, called The
Order, which committed a number of violent crimes, including murder. Their
mission was to bring about a race war and there are several groups that
currently exist which hold these same beliefs. Dennis McGiffen, who also
had ties to the AN, formed a cell called The New Order, based on Mathews'
group. The members were arrested before they could follow through on their
plans to try to start a race war. Chevie Kehoe, who was convicted of three
homicides, conspiracy and interstate transportation of stolen property
also spent some time at the AN compound. Most recently, Buford O. Furrow,
Jr., the man accused of the August 10, 1999, shooting at the Jewish
Community Center in Los Angeles, California, also spent some time at the
AN compound working as a security guard. A
relatively new tenet gaining popularity among Christian Identity believers
justifies the use of violence if it is perpetrated in order to punish
violators of God’s law, as found in the Bible and interpreted by Christian
Identity ministers and adherents. This includes killing interracial
couples, abortionists, prostitutes and homosexuals, burning pornography
stores, and robbing banks and perpetrating frauds to undermine the “usury
system.” Christian Identity adherents engaging in such behavior are
referred to as Phineas Priests or members of the Phineas Priesthood. This
is a very appealing concept to Christian Identity’s extremist members who
believe they are being persecuted by the Jewish-controlled U.S. government
and society and/or are eagerly preparing for Armageddon. Among adherents
today, the Phineas Priesthood is viewed as a call to action or a badge of
honor. There
are a number of white supremacy groups that do not necessarily adhere to
Christian Identity or other religious doctrines. White supremacy groups
such as the National Alliance, the American Nazi Party and the National
Socialist White People’s Party are largely politically, rather than
religiously, motivated. The National Alliance is probably best known for
its leader, William Pierce, who is one of the most recognized names in the
radical right. Pierce wrote The Turner Diaries and Hunter and hosts a
weekly radio program, American Dissident Voices. Via these outlets, Pierce
is able to provide his followers with an ideological and practical
framework for committing violent acts. The rhetoric of these groups
largely shadows that of Adolf Hitler’s in content and political ideology.
In 1997, Pierce stated that: “Ultimately
we must separate ourselves from the Blacks and other non-whites and keep
ourselves separate, no matter what it takes to accomplish this. We must do
this not because we hate Blacks, but because we cannot survive if we
remain mixed with them. And we cannot survive if we permit the Jews and
the traitors among us to remain among us and to repeat their treachery.
Eventually we must hunt them down and get rid of them.”22 The
end goal of National Socialist and Christian Identity devotees is the
same: an all white nation. However, Christian Identity followers appear to
be more of a threat concerning the millennium because of their religious
beliefs. There are also white supremacist groups which adhere to the
general supremacist ideology, but are not political or religious in
nature. For example, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) proposes racial segregation
that is not generally based on religious ideals. The KKK is one of the
most recognized white supremacist groups in the United States. Its history
is expansive and its actions of cross burnings and rhetoric of hate are
well known. There is currently not a singular KKK group with a
hierarchical structure, but many different KKK groups with a common
ideology. The
KKK, as a whole, does not pose a significant threat with regard to the
millennium. That is not to say that a member of the KKK will not act on
his own or in concert with members of another group. Law enforcement has
been very successful in infiltrating a number of these groups, thereby
keeping abreast of their plans for action. The KKK also draws the
attention of many watchdog groups, and the Southern Poverty Law Center
produces a quarterly publication entitled “Klanwatch.” It would be
difficult for any of the known KKK groups to participate in millennial
violence without law enforcement knowing. Again,
there is a great deal of movement that is possible throughout the
right-wing, regardless of prior beliefs. If a member of a Christian
Identity faction does not feel that his current group is taking enough
violent action, it is possible for that member to move on to other
ideologies or organizations such as Odinism, the World Church of the
Creator (WCOTC) or the National Socialist movement. Because of this
movement, it is also likely that communication exists between various
factions of the right-wing, from religious groups to skinheads. Their end
goals are similar. The
WCOTC presents a recent example of violence perpetrated by a white
supremacist in order to bring about a race war. The major creed upon which
Ben Klassen founded the religion is that one's race is his religion. Aside
from this central belief, its ideology is similar to many Christian
Identity groups in the conviction that there is a Jewish conspiracy in
control of the federal government, international banking, and the media.
They also dictate that RAHOWA, a racial holy war, is destined to ensue to
rid the world of Jews and “mud races.” In the early 1990s, there was a
dramatic increase in membership due to the growing belief in the
Apocalypse and that RAHOWA was imminent. In
1996, Matt Hale, who has come upon recent fame by being denied a license
to practice law in Illinois, was appointed the new leader of the Church of
the Creator. Hale made a number of changes to the group, including
changing the name of the organization to the World Church of the Creator,
giving it the feel of a widespread movement. As
publicly reported, there is information to indicate that the WCOTC has
violent plans for the millennium. Officials who searched Benjamin Smith's
apartment, the man who went on a racially motivated killing spree over the
4th of July weekend, found a loose-leaf binder of handwritings. These
writings described a holy war among the races and included a reference to
the new millennium. Passages included plans of how white supremacists
would shoot at non-whites from motor vehicles after the dawning of the new
millennium.23 While the group’s rhetoric
does include the belief in a race war and the creation of an all white
bastion within the United States, other than Smith's writings, there is no
indication that it is linked to the millennium. In
addition, there have been recent incidents that have demonstrated the
willingness of members to take part in violent action. WCOTC members in
Southern Florida are thought to be tied to several racially motivated
beatings. Within the last year, four Florida members were convicted for
the pistol-whipping and robbery of a Jewish video store owner. They were
supposedly trying to raise money for "the revolution."24 Finally,
Odinism is another white supremacist ideology that lends itself to
violence and has the potential to inspire its followers to violence in
connection to the millennium. What makes Odinists dangerous is the fact
that many believe in the necessity of becoming martyrs for their cause.
For example, Bob Mathews, the leader of The Order, died in a fiery
confrontation with law enforcement. Also, William King relished the fact
that he would receive the death penalty for his act of dragging James
Byrd, Jr. to his death. Odinism has little to do with Christian Identity
but there is one key similarity: Odinism provides dualism -- as does
Christian Identity -- with regard to the universe being made up of worlds
of light (white people) and worlds of dark (non-white people). The most
fundamental difference between the two ideologies is that Odinists do not
believe in Jesus Christ. However, there are enough similarities between
the myths and legends of Odinism and the beliefs of Christian Identity to
make a smooth transition from Christian Identity to Odinism for those
racist individuals whose penchant for violence is not being
satisfied. The
majority of growth within the militia movement occurred during the 1990s.
There is not a simple definition of how a group qualifies as a militia.
However, the following general criteria can be used as a guideline: (1) a
militia is a domestic organization with two or more members; (2) the
organization must possess and use firearms; and (3) the organization must
conduct or encourage paramilitary training. Other terms used to describe
militias are Patriots and Minutemen. Most
militias engage in a variety of anti-government rhetoric. This discourse
can range from the protesting of government policies to the advocating of
violence and/or the overthrow of the federal government. However, the
majority of militia groups are non-violent and only a small segment of the
militias actually commit acts of violence to advance their political goals
and beliefs. A number of militia leaders, such as Lynn Van Huizen of the
Michigan Militia Corps -Wolverines, have gone to some effort to actively
rid their ranks of radical members who are inclined to carry out acts of
violence and/or terrorism.25 Officials at the
FBI Academy classify militia groups within four categories, ranging from
moderate groups who do not engage in criminal activity to radical cells
which commit violent acts of terrorism.26 It should be clearly
stated that the FBI only focuses on radical elements of the militia
movement capable and willing to commit violence against government, law
enforcement, civilian, military and international targets. In addition,
any such investigation of these radical militia units must be conducted
within strict legal parameters. Militia
anxiety and paranoia specifically relating to the year 2000 are based
mainly on a political ideology, as opposed to religious beliefs. Many
militia members believe that the year 2000 will lead to political and
personal repression enforced by the United Nations and countenanced by a
compliant U.S. government. This belief is commonly known as the New World
Order (NWO) conspiracy theory (see Chapter I, Introduction). Other issues
which have served as motivating factors for the militia movement include
gun control, the incidents at Ruby Ridge (1992) and Waco (1993), the
Montana Freemen Standoff (1996) and the restriction of land use by federal
agencies. One component of the NWO conspiracy theory -- that of the use of
American military bases by the UN -- is worth exploring in further detail.
Law enforcement officers, as well as military personnel, should be aware
that the nation's armed forces have been the subject of a great deal of
rumor and paranoia circulating among many militia groups. One
can find numerous references in militia literature to military bases to be
used as concentration camps in the NWO and visiting foreign military
personnel conspiring to attack Americans. One example of this can be found
on the website for the militia group United States Theatre Command
(USTC).27 The USTC website
prominently features the NWO theory as it portrays both Camp Grayling in
Michigan and Fort Dix in New Jersey as detention centers to be used to
house prisoners in an upcoming war. Specifically in reference to a
photograph of Camp Grayling, the USTC website states: "Note that the
barbed wire is configured to keep people in, not out, and also note in the
middle of the guard towers, a platform for the mounting of a machine gun."
Specifically in reference to a photograph of Fort Dix, the USTC website
states: "Actual photos of an 'Enemy Prisoner of War' camp in the United
States of America! (Fort Dix, New Jersey to be exact!) Is there going to
be a war here? Many more are suspected to be scattered throughout the
United States." Law
enforcement personnel should be aware of the fact that the majority of
militias are reactive, as opposed to proactive. Reactive militia groups
are generally not a threat to law enforcement or the public. These
militias may indeed believe that some type of NWO scenario may be imminent
in the year 2000, but they are more inclined to sit back and wait for it
to happen. They will stockpile their guns and ammunition and food, and
wait for the government to curtail their liberties and take away their
guns. When the expected NWO tragedy does not take place, these reactive
militias will simply continue their current activities, most of which are
relatively harmless. They will not overreact to minor disruptions of
electricity, water and other public services. However,
there is a small percentage of the militia movement which may be more
proactive and commit acts of domestic terrorism. As stated earlier, the
main focus of the militias connected to the Y2K/millennium revolves around
the NWO conspiracy theory. While the NWO is a paranoid theory, there may
be some real technological problems arising from the year 2000. Among
these are malfunctioning computers, which control so many facets of our
everyday lives. Any such computer malfunctions may adversely affect power
stations and other critical infrastructure. If such breakdowns do occur,
these may be interpreted as a sign by some of the militias that
electricity is being shut off on purpose in order to create an environment
of confusion. In the paranoid rationalizations of these militia groups,
this atmosphere of confusion can only be a prelude to the dreaded NWO/One
World Government. These groups may then follow through on their
premeditated plans of action. As
the millennium approaches, radical fringe members of the Black Hebrew
Israelite (BHI) movement may pose a challenge for law enforcement. As with
the adherents of most apocalyptic philosophies, certain segments of the
BHI movement have the potential to engage in violence at the turn of the
century. This movement has been associated with extreme acts of violence
in the recent past, and current intelligence from a variety of sources
indicates that extreme factions of BHI groups are preparing for a race war
to close the millennium. Violent
BHI followers can generally be described as proponents of an extreme form
of black supremacy. Drawing upon the teachings of earlier BHI adherents,
such groups hold that blacks represent God’s true “chosen people,” while
condemning whites as incarnate manifestations of evil. As God’s
“authentic” Jews, BHI adherents believe that mainstream Jews are actually
imposters. Such beliefs bear a striking resemblance to the Christian
Identity theology practiced by many white supremacists. In fact, Tom
Metzger, renowned white supremacist, once remarked, “They’re the black
counterpart of us.”28 Like their
Christian Identity counterparts, militant BHI followers tend to see
themselves as divinely endowed by God with superior status. As a result,
some followers of this belief system hold that violence, including murder,
is justifiable in the eyes of God, provided that it helps to rid the world
of evil. Violent BHI groups are of particular concern as the millennium
approaches because they believe in the inevitability of a race war between
blacks and whites. The
extreme elements of the BHI movement are prone to engage in violent
activity. As seen in previous convictions of BHI followers, adherents of
this philosophy have a proven history of violence, and several indications
point toward a continuation of this trend. Some BHI followers have been
observed in public donning primarily black clothing, with emblems and/or
patches bearing the “Star of David” symbol. Some BHI members practice
paramilitary operations and wear web belts and shoulder holsters. Some
adherents have extensive criminal records for a variety of violations,
including weapons charges, assault, drug trafficking, and
fraud. In
law enforcement circles, BHI groups are typically associated with violence
and criminal activity, largely as a result of the movement’s
popularization by Yahweh Ben Yahweh, formerly known as Hulon Mitchell,
Jr., and the Miami-based Nation of Yahweh (NOY). In reality, the origins
of the BHI movement are non-violent. While the BHI belief system may have
roots in the United States as far back as the Civil War era, the movement
became more recognized as a result of the teachings of an individual known
as Ben Ami Ben Israel, a.k.a Ben Carter, from the south side of Chicago.
Ben Israel claims to have had a vision at the age of 27, hearing “a voice
tell me that the time had come for Africans in America, the descendants of
the Biblical Israelites, to return to the land of our forefathers.”29 Ben Israel persuaded a
group of African-Americans to accompany him to Israel in 1967, teaching
that African-Americans descended from the biblical tribe of Judah and,
therefore, that Israel is the land of their birthright. Ben Israel and his
followers initially settled in Liberia for the purposes of cleansing
themselves of bad habits. In 1969, a small group of BHI followers left
Liberia for Israel, with Ben Israel and the remaining original migrants
arriving in Israel the following year. Public source estimates of the BHI
community in Israel number between 1500 and 3000. 30 Despite promoting
non-violence, members of Ben Israel's movement have shown a willingness to
engage in criminal activity. For example, in 1986, Ben Israel and his top
aide, Prince Asiel Ben Israel, were convicted of trafficking stolen
passports and securities and forging checks and savings bonds.31 BHI
in Israel are generally peaceful, if somewhat controversial. The FBI has
no information to indicate that Ben Israel’s BHI community in Israel is
planning any activity - terrorist, criminal, or otherwise - inspired by
the coming millennium. Ben Israel’s claims to legitimate Judaism have at
times caused consternation to the Israeli government. BHI adherents in
Israel have apparently espoused anti-Semitic remarks, labeling Israeli
Jews as “imposters.”32 Neither the Israeli
government nor the Orthodox rabbinate recognize the legitimacy of BHI
claims to Judaism. According to Jewish law, an individual can be
recognized as Jewish if he/she was born to a Jewish mother or if the
individual agrees to convert to Judaism.33 At present, BHI in Israel
have legal status as temporary residents, which gives them the right to
work and live in Israel, but not to vote. They are not considered to be
Israeli citizens. While BHI claims to Judaism are disregarded by Israeli
officials and religious leaders, the BHI community is tolerated and
appears to be peaceful.34 While
the BHI community in Israel is peaceful, BHI adherents in the United
States became associated with violence thanks to the rise of the NOY,
which reached the height of its popularity in the 1980s. The NOY was
founded in 1979 and led by Yahweh Ben Yahweh. Ben Yahweh’s followers
viewed him as the Messiah, and therefore demonstrated unrequited and
unquestioned obedience. Members of the organization engaged in numerous
acts of violence in the 1980s, including several homicides, following
direct orders from Ben Yahweh. Seventeen NOY members were indicted by a
federal grand jury in Miami in 1990-91 on charges of RICO, RICO
conspiracy, and various racketeering acts. Various members were convicted
on RICO conspiracy charges and remain imprisoned. While the overwhelming
majority of BHI followers are unlikely to engage in violence, there are
elements of this movement with both the motivation and the capability to
engage in millennial violence. Some radical BHI adherents are clearly
motivated by the conviction that the approach of the year 2000 brings
society ever closer to a violent confrontation between blacks and whites.
While the rhetoric professed by various BHI groups is fiery and
threatening, there are no indications of explicitly identified targets for
violence, beyond a general condemnation and demonization of whites and
“imposter” Jews. Militant BHI groups tend to distrust the United States
government; however, there are no specific indications of imminent
violence toward the government. For
apocalyptic cults, especially biblically based ones, the millennium is
viewed as the time that will signal a major transformation for the world.
Many apocalyptic cults share the belief that the battle against Satan, as
prophesied in the Book of Revelation, will begin in the years surrounding
the millennium and that the federal government is an arm of Satan.
Therefore, the millennium will bring about a battle between cult
members—religious martyrs—and the government. In
the broadest meaning, cults are composed of individuals who demonstrate
“great devotion to a person, idea, object or movement.”35 However, using that
definition, many domestic terrorist groups could be characterized as
cults, including Christian Identity churches, Black Hebrew Israelites, and
some militias. For law enforcement purposes, a narrower interpretation of
groups that qualify as cults is needed. A more useful definition of cults
incorporates the term “cultic relationships” to describe the interactions
within a cult.36 Specifically,
a cultic relationship refers to “one in which a person intentionally
induces others to become totally or nearly totally dependent on him or her
for almost all major life decisions, and inculcates in these followers a
belief that he or she has some special talent, gift, or knowledge.”37 This
definition of cults provides important distinctions that are vital for
analyzing a cult’s predilection towards violence. The
origin of the cult, the role of its leader, and its uniqueness provide a
framework for understanding what distinguishes cults from other domestic
terrorist groups that otherwise share many similar characteristics. These
distinctions are: (1) cult leaders are self-appointed, persuasive persons
who claim to have a special mission in life or have special knowledge; (2)
a cult’s ideas and dogma claim to be innovative and exclusive; and (3)
cult leaders focus their members’ love, devotion and allegiance on
themselves.38 These
characteristics culminate in a group structure that is frequently highly
authoritarian in structure. Such a structure is a sharp contrast to the
rapidly emerging trend among domestic terrorist groups towards a
leaderless, non-authoritarian structure. While predicting violence is
extremely difficult and imprecise, there are certain characteristics that
make some cults more prone to violence. Law enforcement officials should
be aware of the following factors:
• Sequestered Groups: Members of sequestered groups lose access to the outside world and information preventing critical evaluation of the ideas being espoused by the leader.
Apocalyptic
cults see their mission in two general ways: They either want to
accelerate the end of time or take action to ensure that they survive the
millennium. For example, Aum Shinrikyo wanted to take action to hasten the
end of the world, while compounds in general are built to survive the
endtime safely. An analysis of millennial cults by the FBI’s Behavioral
Science Unit describes how rhetoric changes depending on whether the
leader’s ideology envisions the group as playing an active role in the
coming Apocalypse or a passive survivalist role: A
cult that predicts that “God will punish” or “evil will be punished”
indicates a more passive and less threatening posture than the cult that
predicts that “God’s chosen people will punish . . .” As another example,
the members of a passive group might predict that God or another being
will one day liberate their souls from their bodies or come to carry them
away. The followers of a more action-oriented group would, in contrast,
predict that they themselves will one day shed their mortal bodies or
transport themselves to another place.39 A
cult that displays these characteristics may then produce three
social-psychological components, referred to as the "Lethal Triad," that
predispose a cult towards violence aimed at its members and/or
outsiders.40 Cults in which members are
heavily dependent on the leader for all decision making almost always
physically and psychologically isolate their members from outsiders, the
first component of the triad.41 The other two
components interact in the following way: “...
isolation causes a reduction of critical thinking on the part of group
members who become entrenched in the belief proposed by the group
leadership. As a result, group members relinquish all responsibility for
group decision making to their leader and blame the cause of all group
grievances on some outside entity or force, a process known as projection.
Finally, isolation and projection combine to produce pathological anger,
the final component of the triad.”42 Of
the nearly 1000 cults operating in the United States, very few present
credible threats for millennial violence. Law enforcement officials should
concentrate on those cults that advocate force or violence to achieve
their goals concerning the endtime, as well as those cults which possess a
substantial number of the distinguishing traits listed above.43 In particular, cults of
greatest concern to law enforcement are those that: (1) believe they play
a special, elite role in the endtime; (2) believe violent offensive action
is needed to fulfill their endtime prophecy; (3) take steps to attain
their beliefs. Those factors may culminate in plans to initiate conflict
with outsiders or law enforcement. The violent tendencies of dangerous
cults can be classified into two general categories-- defensive violence
and offensive violence. Defensive violence is utilized by cults to defend
a compound or enclave that was created specifically to eliminate most
contact with the dominant culture.44
The 1993 clash in Waco, Texas at the Branch
Davidian complex is an illustration of such defensive violence. History
has shown that groups that seek to withdraw from the dominant culture
seldom act on their beliefs that the endtime has come unless
provoked.45 Cults
with an apocalyptic agenda, particularly those that appear ready to
initiate rather than anticipate violent confrontations to bring about
Armageddon or fulfill "prophesy" present unique challenges to law
enforcement officials. One example of this type of group is the Concerned
Christians (CC). Monte Kim Miller, the CC leader, claims to be one of the
two witnesses or prophets described in the Book of Revelation who will die
on the streets of Jerusalem prior to the second coming of Christ. To
attain that result, members of the CC traveled to Israel in 1998 in the
belief that Miller will be killed in a violent confrontation in the
streets of Jerusalem in December 1999. CC members believe that Miller's
death will set off an apocalyptic end to the millennium, at which time all
of Miller's followers will be sent to Heaven. Miller has convinced his
followers that America is “Babylon the Great” referred to in the Book of
Revelation. In early October 1998, CC members suddenly vanished from the
United States, an apparent response to one of Miller’s “prophesies” that
Denver would be destroyed on October 10, 1998. In January 1999, fourteen
members of the group who had moved to Jerusalem were deported by the
Israeli government on the grounds that they were preparing to hasten the
fulfillment of Miller’s prophecies by instigating violence.46 Ascertaining
the intentions of such cults is a daunting endeavor, particularly since
the agenda or plan of a cult is often at the whim of its leader. Law
enforcement personnel should become well acquainted with the previously
mentioned indicators of potential cult violence in order to separate the
violent from the non-violent. VIII. THE
SIGNIFICANCE OF JERUSALEM The
city of Jerusalem, cherished by Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike, faces
many serious challenges as the year 2000 approaches. As already evidenced
by the deportation of various members of the religious cult known as the
Concerned Christians, zealotry from all three major monotheistic religions
is particularly acute in Israel, where holy shrines, temples, churches,
and mosques are located. While events surrounding the millennium in
Jerusalem are much more problematic for the Israeli government than for
the United States, the potential for violent acts in Jerusalem will cause
reverberations around the world, including the United States. The extreme
terrorist fringes of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam are all present in
the United States. Thus, millennial violence in Jerusalem could
conceivably lead to violence in the United States as well. Within
Jerusalem, the Temple Mount, or Haram al-Sharif, holds a special
significance for both Muslims and Jews.47 The Temple Mount houses
the third holiest of all Islamic sites, the Dome of the Rock. Muslims
believe that the prophet Muhammad ascended to Heaven from a slab of stone
-- the “Rock of Foundation”-- located in the center of what is now the
Dome of the Rock. In addition, when Arab armies conquered Jerusalem in 638
A.D., the Caliph Omar built the al-Aqsa Mosque facing the Dome of the Rock
on the opposite end of the Temple Mount. The Western (or Wailing) Wall,
the last remnant of the second Jewish temple that the Romans destroyed in
70 A.D., stands at the western base of the Temple Mount. The Western Wall
has long been a favorite pilgrimage site for Jews, and religious men and
women pray there on a daily basis. Thus, the Temple Mount is equally
revered by Jews as the site upon which the first and second Jewish Temples
stood. Israeli
officials are extremely concerned that the Temple Mount, an area already
seething with tension and distrust among Jews and Muslims, will be the
stage for violent encounters between religious zealots. Most troubling is
the fact that an act of terrorism need not be the catalyst that sparks
widespread violence. Indeed, a simple symbolic act of desecration, or even
perceived desecration, of any of the holy sites on the Temple Mount is
likely to trigger a violent reaction. For example, the Islamic holy month
of Ramadan is expected to coincide with the arrival of the year 2000.
Thus, even minor provocations on or near the Temple Mount may provide the
impetus for a violent confrontation. The implications of pilgrimages to
Jerusalem by vast numbers of tourists are ominous, particularly since such
pilgrimages are likely to include millennial or apocalyptic cults on a
mission to hasten the arrival of the Messiah. There is general concern
among Israeli officials that Jewish and Islamic extremists may react
violently to the influx of Christians, particularly near the Temple Mount.
The primary concern is that extreme millennial cults will engage in
proactive violence designed to hasten the second coming of Christ. Perhaps
the most likely scenario involves an attack on the Al-Aqsa Mosque or the
Dome of the Rock. Some millennial cults hold that these structures must be
destroyed so that the Jewish Temple can be rebuilt, which they see as a
prerequisite for the return of the Messiah. Additionally, several
religious cults have already made inroads into Israel, apparently in
preparation for what they believe to be the endtimes. It
is beyond the scope of this document to assess the potential repercussions
from an attack on Jewish or Islamic holy sites in Jerusalem. It goes
without saying, however, that an attack on the Dome of the Rock or the
Al-Aqsa Mosque would have serious implications. In segments of the Islamic
world, close political and cultural ties between Israel and the United
States are often perceived as symbolic of anti-Islamic policies by the
Western world. Attacks on Islamic holy sites in Jerusalem, particularly by
Christian or Jewish extremists, are likely to be perceived by Islamic
extremists as attacks on Islam itself. Finally, the possibility exists
that Islamic extremist groups will capitalize upon the huge influx of
foreigners into Jerusalem and engage in a symbolic attack. Extremists
from various ideological perspectives attach significance to the arrival
of the year 2000, and there are some signs of preparations for violence.
The significance of the new millennium is based primarily upon either
religious beliefs relating to the Apocalypse/Armageddon, or political
beliefs relating to the New World Order conspiracy theory. The challenge
to law enforcement is to understand these extremist theories and, if any
incidents do occur, be prepared to respond to the unique crises they will
represent. Law
enforcement officials should be particularly aware that the new millennium
may increase the odds that extremists may engage in proactive violence
specifically targeting law enforcement officers. Religiously motivated
extremists may initiate violent conflicts with law enforcement officials
in an attempt to facilitate the onset of Armageddon, or to help fulfill a
"prophesy." For many on the extreme right-wing, the battle of Armageddon
is interpreted as a race war to be fought between Aryans and the "satanic"
Jews and their allies. Likewise, extremists who are convinced that the
millennium will lead to a One World Government may choose to engage in
violence to prevent such a situation from occurring. In either case,
extremists motivated by the millennium could choose martyrdom when
approached or confronted by law enforcement officers. Thus, law
enforcement officials should be alert for the following: 1) plans to
initiate conflict with law enforcement; 2) the potential increase in the
number of extremists willing to become martyrs; and 3) the potential for a
quicker escalation of conflict during routine law enforcement activities
(e.g. traffic stops, issuance of warrants, etc.).
1 U.S.
Congress, Senate, Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology Problem,
Investigating the Impact of the Year 2000 Problem, February 24, 1996, pp.
1-6. |